Countries with which the US has a trade surplus, such as Australia, got hit with a “baseline” rate of 10 per cent. The ban on US beef had no discernible impact.
Alan Cole, a senior economist at the US Tax Foundation think tank, confirmed he had replicated the calculations using census trade data from 2024.
Indeed, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) in effect confirmed this is what it did.
“Reciprocal tariffs are calculated as the tariff rate necessary to balance bilateral trade deficits between the US and each of our trading partners,” it said in a statement. “This calculation assumes that persistent trade deficits are due to a combination of tariff and non-tariff factors that prevent trade from balancing.”
That’s a pretty big, conspiratorial assumption. Maybe, when there’s a trade deficit, it’s just because the US wants more stuff from a country than that country wants from the US.
The USTR went on: “While individually computing the trade deficit effects of tens of thousands of tariff, regulatory, tax and other policies in each country is complex, if not impossible, their combined effects can be proxied by computing the tariff level consistent with driving bilateral trade deficits to zero.”
In other words: they didn’t bother trying to evaluate the significance of these so-called trade barriers and grievances, and assigning a “reciprocal” tariff in return. They just used the trade balance as a proxy.
It could have been done by an AI chatbot. Maybe it was.
Trump loves to accuse the mainstream media of perpetrating “hoax” stories against him, but in this case, the concept of reciprocal tariffs appears to be a hoax of his own.
It’s worth noting that the president’s legal justification for these tariffs is also thin. He is declaring a national emergency on trade deficits using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and two other laws.
The executive order contends: “Underlying conditions, including a lack of reciprocity in our bilateral trade relationships, disparate tariff rates and non-tariff barriers, and US trading partners’ economic policies that suppress domestic wages and consumption … constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and economy of the United States.”
Expect that to be challenged. At the same time as Trump was unveiling his Liberation Day tariffs, four Senate Republicans sided with Democrats in the Senate to pass a bill that would rescind Trump’s earlier emergency declaration regarding the Canadian border, used as justification for tariffs on that country.
The four senators crossed the floor, so to speak, despite Trump warning them not to and blasting them as “extremely difficult to deal with and, unbelievably disloyal”.
Loading
There’s little prospect of the bill passing the House of Representatives, but it indicates growing frustration within Republican ranks about Trump’s tariff agenda – and the way he’s going about it.
“Tariffs are a terrible mistake,” Rand Paul, a Republican senator from Kentucky, told the chamber. “They don’t work, they will lead to higher prices, they are a tax, and they have historically been bad for our economy.
“But even if this was something that was magic, and it was going to be a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, I wouldn’t want to live under emergency rule.”
